|
Previous Commentaries If present trends continue, it is likely that a revolution will occur in the United States because the regime that controls this country is creating all the right conditions for one: racial balkanization, political oppression through a two party stranglehold, and the destruction of the middle class. Of course, the regime knows that the American people can only take so much, hence their moves to militarize the police, pass "anti terrorist" laws to restrict our rights, build FEMA camps, and establish policies that would allow them to put Americans in those FEMA camps. What are the chances for a revolution? The average man will never support a revolution because of government stupidity, corruption, or even treason. If that were the case America would have had a revolution decades ago. However, the average man would be more likely to take up arms against his government if he believed that his government was not only corrupt, but unwilling or unable to provide for his basic necessities such as food (stable food distribution and security), electrical power (TV/Entertainment), and a stable economy (jobs). For the average man to take up arms against his government, he not only has to see his government as corrupt and oppressive, but he also must have nothing left to lose. There is only a small minority of men who would be willing to take up arms for the noble ideals of freedom and justice. Therefore, we can assume that a revolution will come about only if the rebellious minority senses that a large enough portion of the majority has nothing left to lose. History shows that revolutions only have a chance to succeed when there is at least 5% support in the general population. Is a military victory over U.S. government forces possible? Victories over high tech armies by low tech insurgents has been successful in Vietnam, Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. This shows that hi-tech weaponry alone is not enough to win wars. Also there are 100 million gun owners in the United States. Even a small percentage of them would constitute a formidable force - especially when one remembers that an occupation force (U.S. government) must have more men in the field than the guerillas in order to hold territory - upwards of 50 to 1. Combined with that, many revolutionaries would be former and active U.S. servicemen who would bring their military expertise to the cause - tipping the balance of power away from the government and towards the people. This last point depends on a two things: Does the revolution have a chance to succeed, and how much hatred does the average soldier and veteran have for the government? Since every man wants to be on the winning side, the revolutionaries must demonstrate that they can maintain a fighting force despite government counter-revolutionary measures. The longer that they can carry out operations against the government, the more likely they will attract new supporters from both inside and outside the government. For more information see:
Guerrilla warfare The U.S. Army/Marine Corps Counterinsurgency Field Manual Mass Democracy In our country, the country we love, we are free to write or say anything against our government without fear of being arrested or harassed - that is until we start attracting a large following - then we are not so free anymore. Remember Ross Perot? When the regime thought that too many people were listening to what he had to say about government corruption they attacked him with the racist card. Years later they used the same tactic against Pat Buchanan and Ron Paul. They play the same game over and over. If the regime can't ignore you because you have a large following, then they portray you as a "racist" or "extremist" to discredit you, and if that doesn't work, then you get the Huey Long, General Patton, or Deborah Jeane Palfrey treatment, they kill you by assassination, "accident", or "suicide". Do you believe that Democracy means having free and fair elections? Don't make me laugh. Democracy is anything but free and fair elections. You can be on the ballot in every state, and still be kept out of the Presidential debates - is that fair? In every Democratic nation the elections are manipulated by the mass media. Whoever controls the media controls most of the politicians, because the media can sway most voters to vote for any candidate or party they want, and the politicians know it! The fact is, most people are not qualified to vote. They might be qualified to vote on the local level where they are more in tune with local issues, but on the national level - forget it. Another reason why modern Democracy isn't really an honest form of government is the Orwellian way they conduct their affairs. When the U.S. wanted to invade Iraq for example, one of the reasons they gave was to "preserve the peace". So war is now peace? Just as in George Orwell's 1984. Democracies are also the most hypocritical governments. When Nazi Germany invaded Poland, the US government called it evil warmongering, but when America invaded Korea, Vietnam, Panama, Somalia, Iraq, etc, etc, that same government called them justified "military actions". Fooling the majority of voters to get elected gives tyrants almost unlimited power because they received a mandate from the people. Un-elected governments have no such mandate, hence they can more easily be overthrown if they do not serve the peoples interests - provided the people are armed. In both forms of government however, the people are not given a choice as to who their rulers will be. Elected forms of government may give their people the right to vote, but they deny them a free and fair election. They present the people with only candidates from the main political party or parties, all other party candidates are ignored or demonized. If honest people try to infiltrate the main political parties and run on their tickets, the leaders of those parties will not support them, and again, the media will ignore or demonize them. A Democracy is anything but honest and consistent. Consider the following news articles on the U.S. governments policy regarding the heroin drug trade in Afghanistan.
The U.S. government imprisons American citizens for growing and trafficking drugs, yet it uses the Marines to protect drug growers and traffickers in Afghanistan. It tells us that hate speech is wrong, yet it uses hate speech to incite us to hate people and governments they don't like. How often do we here U.S. politicians and the press use the words islamofascists, religious extremists, dictator, strong-man, dangerous, supporter of terrorism, and "threat to world peace"? The U.S. government says it opposes the proliferation of nuclear weapons, yet it allows Israel to acquire and manufacture them. It demands Iran verify that it is not manufacturing weapons grade uranium, but objects to any country that demands Israel verify that their nuclear site at Dimona is not doing the same thing. Our government claims to oppose the idea of a racial state (like Nazi Germany), while at the same time demands every government in the world recognize Israel as a Jewish racial state. It says it will not tolerate ethnic cleansing of people, yet it allows Israel to ethnically cleanse the Palestinians. And while the U.S. government discredits us and our country with hypocritical double standards, there is the Jewish controlled press pretending not to notice. They will report day and night on those "dangerous" Muslims in the Middle East, and on those "dangerous" White and Black nationalists in America who want to throw off Jewish racist domination of their peoples here, but not a word on the U.S. governments warmongering, drug dealing, hypocrisy, and lies. "There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states" - General Wesley Clark during the U.S. bombing of Serbia, 1999. What about Israel, Sir? No comment. I admit it, I hate my government. I hate most of the politicians in it. How could I not? They are nothing more than actors - nay, con-artists (acting being a respectable profession). But most of all, I hate the Jewish racist controlled news media, because it is they who portray these con-artists as trustworthy statesmen when they know they are not. Without the mass media protecting those corrupt and treasonous politicians, they would be exposed for the criminals they are, and as such they would prosecuted, jailed, and for those found guilty of treason - executed. But of course, they do protect them, and as a result they are sowing the seeds for another revolution. If the law has been so badly compromised that it cannot keep the government honest, then someday the people will have no choice but to take the law into their own hands and make it honest, or replace it for another government altogether.
Main Page |